Skip to content
Payload integration hangar interior at Cape Canaveral with technicians preparing a heavy-lift fairing
Intake Channel · Mission Feasibility Review

Open a campaign file.
Book a 60-minute mission feasibility review with our mission directors.

A structured intake for payload program managers planning a heavy or super-heavy launch within 6–24 months. Submit your mission envelope below; our mission directors respond within two business days with a confirmed review window.

CHANNEL INTAKE-04 / MFR GO
WINDOW NEXT 6–24 MO. LAUNCHES OPEN
RESPONSE SLA 2 BUSINESS DAYS ACTIVE
REVIEW FORMAT 60 MIN · VIDEO / PHONE GO
Falcon Heavy Launch, Inc. Cape Canaveral · Bremen File ref. MFR-2025
Section 01 · Scope

What the 60-minute review covers.

Four integration pillars examined in every feasibility review. Read this list before opening a file — if your mission falls inside this envelope, the review will return a concrete compatibility answer.

  1. 01
    Pillar

    Compatibility analysis across heavy-class profiles

    We map your payload envelope against our proprietary Falcon-Heavy Compatibility Matrix — 1,240+ verified payload envelopes, the largest in the industry — and return a first-pass fit against four launch providers in the review itself.

  2. 02
    Pillar

    Fairing allocation and mechanical interface review

    Inner volume, dynamic envelope, adapter ring selection, and separation-system fit. Reviewed against current fairing inventory and reservation lead times across our provider network.

  3. 03
    Pillar

    Regulatory filings and range coordination

    FAA/AST licensing posture, export-control classification (ITAR / EAR), debris mitigation, and range-safety coordination through our direct API integrations with FAA/AST and range-safety systems.

  4. 04
    Pillar

    Ground operations, campaign timeline, and separation posture

    Processing facility fit, transport logistics, integrated campaign schedule, and a separation-accuracy outlook against our 98.4% on-spec separation rate (2014–2024). Benchmarked against our 11.3-month 2024 average timeline.

Out of scope for the review: Launch vehicle selection, pricing, and contract commitments. The feasibility review returns a fit assessment only; campaign scoping follows in a separate proposal.
Section 02 · Credentials

Trusted on 186 campaigns across heavy and super-heavy profiles.

01 186 campaigns delivered since 2014 412 satellites deployed to orbit
02 98.4% on-spec payload separation rate 2014–2024 verified track record
03 11.3 mo average campaign timeline, 2024 vs. 17-month industry median
04 ISO / AS9100D certified quality system ITAR & EAR cleared contractor
Recognized Aviation Week & Space Technology — ‘Top 10 Integrators’, 2022–2024
Awarded Orbital Quarterly Review — ‘Top Independent Launch Integrator 2024’
Cumulative $2.1B payload value integrated on heavy & super-heavy vehicles

Pre-Flight Briefing

What to prepare before the call

Sixty minutes is short. The consultations that produce a useful feasibility answer are the ones where the program team arrives with a tight set of inputs — not a full data room. Bring the following and your mission director will be able to give you a first-pass compatibility read, a regulatory path, and a campaign envelope on the call itself.

  1. 01

    Mass, volume, and center-of-gravity envelope

    Wet mass including adapter, allowable Cg offset, and stowed dimensions against the heavy-class fairing you are targeting. Preliminary values are acceptable — we work to ±15% in the first pass.

  2. 02

    Orbit and deployment profile

    Insertion altitude, inclination tolerance, and any ride-along or separation-sequence constraints. For cislunar or deep-space trajectories, bring the TLI dispersion budget your mission analysis team has already closed.

  3. 03

    Spacecraft-to-launch-vehicle ICD status

    Existing ICD, draft, or none at all. If your bus vendor is still finalizing the mechanical and electrical interface, note the version and target sign-off date — it drives critical-path scheduling.

  4. 04

    Regulatory jurisdiction and export posture

    Which agency licenses the mission (FAA/AST, host-nation, or a foreign launch jurisdiction), and whether your spacecraft, ground software, or deployable payloads trigger ITAR or EAR review. Our team is cleared to handle both.

  5. 05

    Target launch window and any hard dates

    Earliest and latest acceptable launch months, plus any downstream constraint (ground-station handover, constellation phase, planetary window). We will pressure-test the window against the current provider manifests.

  6. 06

    Internal decision authority

    Who on your side can approve a statement of work, and at what dollar threshold. The feasibility review is obligation-free, but the path to a campaign contract is faster if we know your procurement gate on day one.

Not ready on every item? Submit what you have. Our mission directors routinely open the conversation with a partial brief and close the gaps on the call.

Mission Intake

Request a Mission Feasibility Review

Submit the form below and a mission director will respond within five business days to confirm the call and request any missing inputs. Fields marked with an asterisk are required for an initial read.

We respond within 5 business days. By submitting, you agree to our review terms.

Common Questions

Common questions from mission planners.

The four questions our mission directors field most often before a feasibility review. If yours is not below, raise it on the call — we will answer in writing afterwards.

Q.01

How quickly will you respond, and how do I know my brief was received?

Every intake is acknowledged within five business days by a named mission director. If your submission involves ITAR- or EAR-controlled technical data, we issue a reciprocal NDA before the brief is opened by engineering staff.

Q.02

Do you fly the rocket, or do you integrate?

We integrate. Falcon Heavy Launch does not own or operate any launch vehicle. We sit between the operator and the launch provider — owning compatibility analysis, regulatory filings, fairing allocation, and ground operations from contract through separation.

Q.03

What does the feasibility review cost?

The 60-minute consultation and the written summary are provided at no charge and carry no obligation. Formal campaign scoping — statement-of-work drafting, provider coordination, regulatory filings — is scoped separately once a mission clears the review.

Q.04

What happens after the review if we want to proceed?

You receive a written summary within two business days of the call. If you elect to proceed, we issue a statement of work against the campaign envelope discussed — typically leading to a kickoff within 11.3 months of contract, against an industry median of 17 months.

Next Step

Ready when your brief is.

Submit the intake form above, or reach the mission desk directly. A cleared director will respond within five business days.